Home
/
Market news
/
Market trends
/

Why most tokens fail after one cycle: the truth revealed

Why Most Tokens Fail | The Hidden Struggles in the Crypto Arena

By

Maria Lopez

Sep 24, 2025, 07:03 PM

Edited By

Clara Johnson

Updated

Sep 25, 2025, 01:43 AM

2 minutes reading time

A visual representation of various digital tokens rising and then disappearing, symbolizing their brief success in the market.

A wave of questions is shaking the crypto community. As tokens pop up like mushrooms during a bull run only to fizzle out shortly after, experts and people are asking why. Key insights from recent forum discussions reveal underlying issues that could explain the high failure rate of many tokens.

Welcome to the Token Graveyard

Every bull run tells the same story: a slew of shiny new tokens appears, spikes in value, and vanishes without a trace. "Most tokens shouldnโ€™t even last one cycle," one user bluntly states. The sentiment echoes a common theme in the crypto space: many projects simply lack substance.

The Question of Value

People are increasingly questioning the actual utility of these tokens. One commenter highlighted that "many donโ€™t deliver value or are backed by any useful protocol or chain." This raises crucial concerns about the motives behind token creation. Are these assets fundamentally designed as a means for creators to cash out?

Saturation and Survival

Market saturation adds another layer of complexity. Commenters note that while it's normal for projects to die out, some tokensโ€”"blue chip" coins like Solana and Ethereumโ€”manage to thrive thanks to their strong foundations. As one user pointed out, "itโ€™s all about identifying the new ones and the old ones that are here to stay."

"Theyโ€™re scams to begin with. Market makers are pumping so you hold the bad; youโ€™re exit liquidity." This sobering remark encapsulates the skepticism prevalent in these discussions and suggests that many tokens may be built on shaky ground from the start.

Commitment vs. Hype

The need for long-term commitment is becoming crystal clear. Tokens that lack sufficient mechanisms to retain holders often become redundant. "It has to do with long-term commitment rather than hype some, like Vaulta, have rebranded to meet the growing demand of web3 banking," one user noted. Adaptability seems crucial in this fast-evolving landscape.

Unpacking the Takeaways

  • โ—ผ๏ธ Many tokens lack genuine utility, serving primarily for founder profit.

  • โš ๏ธ Users warn that some feel like scams and question the unpredictability of token valuation.

  • โญ During each cycle, only a few tokens exhibit the robustness needed for survival.

In a market filled with fleeting hype, a significant portion of tokens appears to be set up for failure. Without strong commitment structures or real utility, many could find themselves lost in the chaos, while a select few with proven value continue to thrive. As the crypto landscape evolves, keeping an eye on adaptability could be essential for investors and creators alike.