Home
/
Technology insights
/
Blockchain innovations
/

Unmasking the truth: walmart and ibm's blockchain fail

Crypto Controversy | Walmart and IBM's Blockchain Initiative Unravels

By

Lucas Rodriguez

Aug 14, 2025, 01:32 AM

Updated

Aug 14, 2025, 06:33 AM

2 minutes reading time

A depiction of a failed blockchain project with logos of Walmart and IBM, showing a broken link symbol to represent the uncompleted initiative in supply chain tracking.
popular

The failed blockchain project by Walmart and IBM, which began in 2021, continues to spark debate among people in cryptocurrency. Despite initial excitement, reports confirm the initiative fizzled out within a year, illustrating the challenges facing blockchain technology in real-world applications.

The Background of the Controversy

The Walmart-IBM project aimed to enhance supply chain tracking via blockchain, a concept well-received by crypto enthusiasts. However, it never took off as expected, leading to skepticism in the community. As one commenter pointed out,

"They also love to say companies are getting into it when a CEO says they had someone look into it"

This sentiment reflects a growing frustration over businesses that merely explore blockchain possibilities without tangible results.

User Sentiments

Comments in forums reveal a complex mix of disappointment, criticism, and cautious optimism:

  • Skepticism about Claims: Many express doubt regarding the proclaimed benefits of blockchain, highlighting the "Oracle Problem" where blockchain cannot verify authenticity without trusted external data.

  • Counterparty Risks: Critics argue that blockchain does not eliminate counterparty risk. Instead, it shifts the risk from regulated financial institutions to anonymous crypto operators,

"In reality, Bitcoin and crypto doesnโ€™t eliminate counterparty risk or middlemen."

  • Use Cases Questioned: Some delve into the debate over blockchain use cases, suggesting that while decentralized finance may show promise, it does not intrinsically improve on traditional systems.

An Evolving Perspective

Despite the naysayers, some supporters still see potential in blockchain. There's acknowledgment of real-world blockchain projects with valid metrics, such as the DTCCโ€™s Project Ion and De Beersโ€™ Tracr, which have put in place systems that handle massive transaction volumes.

Interestingly, people argue that standardized metrics are lacking in discussions on the effectiveness of many blockchain applications.

Key Points to Consider

  • ๐Ÿšซ The Walmart-IBM blockchain project was inactive within a year.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ "Projects need to yield results to keep the community engaged," stressed a forum commenter.

  • โš ๏ธ Concerns about counterparty risk remain prevalent, with many noting the need for accountability.

  • ๐Ÿ” There are legitimate blockchain projects in operation, shifting perspectives on technology's practical applications.

As these discussions unfold, one must ask: will blockchain technology find its footing in the real world, or will it remain overshadowed by unmet expectations?