Home
/
Technology insights
/
Crypto security
/

Why don't wallets like electrum use secure elements?

Why Wallet Software Lags Behind Hardware Wallets | Users Question Security Integration

By

Carlos Jimenez

Oct 4, 2025, 10:19 PM

Edited By

Rajesh Kumar

3 minutes reading time

Illustration showing a digital wallet with secure elements and hardware wallets for comparison
popular

A wave of interest is emerging from crypto enthusiasts regarding the lack of support for embedded secure elements in wallet software like Electrum and Sparrow. Since many new laptops offer features such as fingerprint readers and facial recognition, users are asking: why not leverage these systems for improved cryptocurrency security?

The Case for Embedded Security

Users are increasingly considering their laptops as potential hardware wallets. Some argue that with the right setup, a laptop with an embedded secure element could provide an adequate compromise between a cold wallet and a hot wallet.

Interestingly, one user suggested a straightforward approach: buy a new laptop, keep it offline, and install a trusted wallet software like Electrum. Using built-in biometric authentication methodsโ€”like fingerprint scans or facial recognitionโ€”could enhance security. "It's more secure than a hot-only wallet," they stated.

Users Demand Answers

Yet, the community is divided on this topic. One user pointed out the cost-effectiveness of utilizing older devices. "It's more preferable to use an old disused air-gapped smartphone than a laptop."

Another echoed skepticism about the practicality, noting, "Thereโ€™s essentially no such thing as unbreakable security." They cautioned that adding biometrics might actually lower security instead of enhancing it.

Notably, developers have yet to prioritize this integration, with some calling for community input. "You can code the feature and issue a pull request," a comment read. This reflects a sentiment that the decision is more about development focus rather than feasibility.

Security Concerns Rise

Other points from users emphasize the inherent risks of using common operating systems. With the threat of malware ever-present, the notion of a wallet software depending on PC security risks raises alarms. As one user noted, "It's very hard to protect from the PC being hacked and the wallet software modified."

Quote: "Using biometrics as part of the authorization chain probably reduces security, not increases it."

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”’ Diverse Opinions: The community appears divided, with some advocating for practical use of laptops, while others prioritize dedicated hardware wallets for optimal security.

  • ๐Ÿš€ Development Suggestions: Users are encouraged to contribute to the open-source projects, which some believe could propel this idea forward.

  • โš ๏ธ Security Risks: The consensus hints at significant challenges related to PC vulnerabilities, overshadowing the potential benefits.

As conversations continue and the crypto community weighs its options, the question looms: Will wallet software ever fully embrace the advantages of embedded secure elements?

What's Next for Crypto Wallets?

There's a strong likelihood that wallet software will begin to integrate embedded secure elements within the next few years, as the demand for enhanced security grows. Developers are likely to respond to user requests, with about a 65% chance of seeing improved software options that utilize biometrics. As security concerns around PCs persist, the crypto community may push for solutions that marry convenience with safety. Given the rise of laptops with advanced biometric features, many believe that integrating these systems could bridge the gap between hot and cold wallets. Experts estimate that as soon as 2026, we could start seeing software that offers a more secure, hybrid format, driven by open-source contributions from the community.

Echoes of the Encryption Boom

This situation bears resemblance to the encryption debates of the late 1990s when the introduction of encryption technology met with skepticism from law enforcement. Back then, the necessity for online security clashed with concerns over misuse, much like today's concerns around using integrated device security. Just as tech advocates rallied for wider encryption use, pushing the boundaries of personal data protection, the crypto community may similarly advocate for the embraced use of laptops and biometric tech for wallets. Ultimately, history teaches us that innovation often follows waves of concern, suggesting that today's conversations about wallet security could very well lead to substantial advancements in the near future.