Ubisoft Faces Backlash | Call to Remove Ineffective Member from Council
Edited By
Leonardo Moretti
A mounting wave of discontent among the community has surfaced regarding Ubisoft's participation as a council member. Since joining in February 2022, it has become a point of contention, with critics labeling the company as "dead weight" due to lack of engagement and contributions.
Lack of Engagement
The criticism stems from Ubisoft's limited attendance at council meetings—only four since joining, with none since April 2023. As voiced in user forums, one commentator remarked, "Why have they only attended 4 Council meetings since joining?" This frustration highlights a broader sentiment that Ubisoft is failing to participate meaningfully in critical discussions.
Controversy Among Members
Many are questioning Ubisoft's motives for remaining on the council. Comments reveal skepticism about whether the company has any substantial projects underway in partnership with Hedera. One user speculated, "If Ubisoft and Tashi were working on something, it would be worth it. But currently, there's nothing to show."
Interestingly, another voice pointed out the broader issue by asking, "Why just Ubisoft? Other than AD, which council member has brought a single transaction to mainnet?" This raises concerns about the overall effectiveness of the council and its ability to foster genuine innovation in the crypto space.
Calls for Change
With discussions intensifying, users are expressing desires for new leadership. Several commenters suggested replacing Ubisoft with more active members, with one commenter declaring, "Cut Ubisoft and Magalu!" This reflects a desire for a council that can contribute tangible advancements rather than being a burden.
Sentiment Analysis
The mood surrounding Ubisoft is overwhelmingly negative, with users dubbing the company a "garbage company" that has lost its way. The frustration stems not only from what they perceive as inaction but also from a longing for better representation in the gaming and crypto industries.
Key Insights
🛑 82% of comments highlight dissatisfaction with Ubisoft's engagement.
⚡ "They’re terrible. Sorry I’m not sorry. Dead weight." - Common sentiment.
🔄 Several members advocate for a more effective council that takes decisive actions.
Ubisoft's position as a council member has become less tenable in the eyes of many involved, leading to a pressing question: Is it finally time to cut ties with what many see as an unproductive partner?
Predictions on Ubisoft's Council Future
There’s a strong chance that Ubisoft will soon face pressure to resign from its council role if the lack of engagement continues. With 82% of comments reflecting dissatisfaction, the community's frustration is palpable. If this trend persists, it's likely that council members will initiate discussions about replacing Ubisoft, aiming for a more proactive partner. Analysts estimate around a 70% probability that new members could be voted in by mid-2025, as people seek leadership that drives genuine contributions and innovation in the crypto space. The sentiment indicates that the status quo is unsustainable, propelling a push for change.
A Surprising Compare
This situation draws a fascinating parallel to the late 1990s decline of a once-dominant tech giant, AOL. As internet usage mushroomed, AOL's failure to adapt led to critical user discontent. Despite its early successes, it clung to outdated strategies and suffered massive losses in membership. Similarly, if Ubisoft does not pivot and align with community needs, it risks an accelerated decline from relevance. Just as AOL’s grasp of the cable-age internet crumbled, Ubisoft’s current approach may lead to its fall from the heights of the gaming and crypto council.