Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Impact analysis
/

Truth social seeks sec approval for crypto etf

Truth Social Seeks SEC Approval for Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF | Trumpโ€™s Financial Moves Under Scrutiny

By

James Thompson

Jun 18, 2025, 08:34 AM

Edited By

Nina Evans

3 minutes reading time

A graphic representing Truth Social's pursuit of SEC approval for a Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF, with cryptocurrency symbols and stock market elements.
popular

In a controversial move, Truth Social has submitted a request to the SEC for an ETF focused on Bitcoin and Ethereum. Critics argue this initiative raises serious ethical concerns, especially as Donald Trumpโ€™s financial interests appear to benefit yet again.

As Truth Social tries to navigate the complex landscape of cryptocurrency, concerns are burgeoning among the public and financial authorities. Some individuals believe this could lead to further enrichment for the Trump family, particularly if government funds become involved in such ventures.

The Community's Reaction

Comments on various forums reflect mixed feelings regarding the ETF proposal and its implications. Here's a summary of the perspectives:

  1. Concerns Over Ethical Implications

The sentiment on forums reflects deep skepticism. One comment bluntly states, "If no one is stupid enough to buy it, it has zero effect. A fool and their money are soon parted." This implies a belief that public interest might fall short.

  1. Historical Comparisons

Another user likened the situation to "Confederate scrip," suggesting it mirrors past financial failures lacking real value. Such comparisons highlight fears of losing investment in so-called 'novelties' rather than genuine financial instruments.

  1. Nostalgia for Tangible Value

A recurring theme in the discussions surrounds the difference between digital assets and tangible currencies. One user reminisced, "At least that shit made for a fun toy back in the 90s" indicating a longing for the perceived security of physical money versus digital speculation.

"They want to make new off-roads from crypto, to cash out real money while the gettin is still good," noted a forum contributor, underscoring opportunistic perceptions around the ETF proposal.

Key Insights

  • โ–ณ Public skepticism continues to grow regarding Trump's connection to cryptocurrency initiatives.

  • โ–ฝ SEC's decision remains pending, with significant implications on market response.

  • โ€ป "This sets a dangerous precedent," warns a top-voted comment.

In a time when financial technology is rapidly evolving, this development from Truth Social provides a significant case study in ethics, cryptocurrency speculation, and political influence. Will this ETF succeed, or will it face the same skepticism that has plagued cryptocurrencies? The unfolding story is one to watch.

Potential Pathways Ahead

As Truth Social's ETF request sits with the SEC, thereโ€™s a strong chance it could face significant delays or outright rejection, largely due to the ethical questions surrounding Trump's involvement. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that the SEC will demand more transparency before moving forward, pushing the spotlight back onto government funds and their use in private ventures. In the event of approval, we may see a brief surge of interest, yet public skepticism could lead to a market dip as questions of credibility continue to haunt this venture. Overall, itโ€™s likely that the discussion around cryptocurrency will only intensify, further sparking debates over regulatory frameworks and financial ethics.

A Lesson from the Dot-Com Bubble

A notable parallel can be drawn from the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s, where numerous internet startups excited investors with little more than flashy websites and promises. Much like Truth Social's ETF, many of those startups lacked a sustainable model but thrived on speculation and hype. When the bubble burst, the fallout cast a long shadow over the tech industry, leading to stricter regulations and a more cautious investment climate. Todayโ€™s cryptocurrency speculation leads to similar questions: Will we learn from the past, or are we destined to repeat it under the allure of rapidly evolving technology?