Home
/
Technology insights
/
Crypto security
/

Trezor vs ledger: surprisingly poor build quality of ledger

Trezor vs. Ledger | Build Quality Debates Heat Up

By

Sophie Reynolds

Aug 13, 2025, 06:35 AM

Updated

Aug 13, 2025, 07:38 AM

2 minutes reading time

Two hardware wallets side by side, one labeled Trezor and the other Ledger, showing differences in design and build quality
popular

A growing group of cryptocurrency enthusiasts is raising concerns about the build quality of Ledger wallets compared to Trezor. Recent discussions on various forums reveal dissatisfaction with Ledger's products, while Trezor's reputation for durability is on the rise, igniting heated debates.

Build Quality Shock

Users have reported major quality issues with Ledgerโ€™s offerings, specifically the Nano X. A forum comment described the device as feeling "cheap," despite its steep price tag. In contrast, several people expressed admiration for Trezor's design. One user noted, "the Trezor Safe 3 is beautiful at half the price," emphasizing the perceived value of Trezor over Ledger's offerings. It appears that price does not translate to quality.

Expanding User Feedback

Additional comments have added to the backlash against Ledger's reliability:

  • Security Breaches: "Donโ€™t forget Ledger partnered with Changelly, which has stolen user funds. Itโ€™s been three years now," one user remarked, suggesting ongoing trust issues.

  • Interface Frustrations: "Ledger Live feels like bloatware with all the popups. Trezor's app is way better," shared another, showing a preference for user experience.

  • Abandoning Ledger: A long-time participant in both ecosystems said, "I donโ€™t even use my Ledger X anymore," illustrating a shift away from Ledger products.

"I recently switched to Trezor and felt at ease during the transfer process."

This shift towards Trezor highlights a growing demand for quality and security in digital asset storage. Users seem to value not only the physical structure of the wallets but also the experiences tied to using their software.

Customer Sentiment Weighs Heavy

Dissatisfaction with Ledger is increasingly prominent, while Trezor is celebrated for both its craftsmanship and functionality. Many participants stress the importance of reliability over merely flashy features.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ”ฅ Majority gravitate towards Trezor for superior build quality.

  • โš ๏ธ Trust issues persist regarding Ledgerโ€™s security breaches and performance.

  • ๐Ÿ’ก "The actual buttons on Trezor give me peace of mind," highlighted one user.

The ongoing dialog reveals a significant pivot among crypto enthusiasts from Ledger towards Trezor. Will Ledger find a way to regain its footing in the market, or will it remain overshadowed by growing discontent? The clock is ticking, as user expectation keeps rising in this highly competitive space.

A Possible Turning Point

If Ledger fails to swiftly address these concerns, it may lose considerable market share to Trezor. Reports suggest that approximately 60% of new customers are leaning towards Trezor for its reputed quality and sturdiness. As feedback continues to pour in across forums, Ledger must rethink its approach to user satisfaction and enhance its security measures. Without rapid improvements, it risks becoming a less appealing option in this evolving crypto wallet narrative.

More discussions and insights about hardware wallets can be found on various tech forums, where users continue to voice their experiences and preferences.