Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Impact analysis
/

Senator takes a stand: bill targets trumpโ€™s crypto links

Senator Targets Trump's Crypto Links | New Legislation Faces Tough Prospects

By

Aisha Mohammed

Jun 24, 2025, 05:33 AM

Edited By

Lina Chen

Updated

Jun 24, 2025, 12:38 PM

2 minutes reading time

A Democratic senator stands at a podium, discussing a bill related to Trump's cryptocurrency links, with a backdrop of a government building.
popular

Senator Adam Schiff, backed by fellow Democrats, is pushing the COIN Act to tackle issues around President Trump's cryptocurrency dealings. Amid concerns regarding Trump's affiliations with companies like World Liberty Financial and its USD1 stablecoin, the legislation attempts to impose stricter rules on public officials regarding digital assets.

Building the Case for Ethical Reform

The COIN Act aims to solidify rules preventing public officials, including their family members, from profiting off cryptocurrencies while holding office. This expansion comes in response to suggestions that conflicts of interest should also include relatives of lawmakers.

Interestingly, commentary on the act features skepticism about its viability with a Republican-led Congress. One observer noted, "Lesson in futility."

Bipartisan Resistance

Concerns continue to mount as people voice apprehension over the bill's chances:

  • "Should be a no-brainer but Republicans donโ€™t care," reflects the frustration felt by several.

  • Another pointedly remarked, "Yep. Mike Johnson will definitely take up the House version, get that reconciled asap." This suggests a lack of confidence in genuine bipartisan support.

  • Others simply declare, "Not happening while Republicans control both chambers."

The potential for the bill to actually advance appears slim, with analysts estimating only a 30% chance of success, primarily due to the political dynamics in place.

Public Sentiment on Ethical Practices

Widespread skepticism surrounds the effort, with citizens questioning if similar bills addressing congressional profiting from insider information will be pursued. As one commenter articulated, "Has this same Senator introduced bills banning Congress profiting via insider knowledge?"

Public opinion shapes around the belief that proposed changes seem more performative than practical, with many considering the initiative unlikely to spark any real change. This commentary underscores the ongoing frustrations connected to perceived corruption inside Washington.

Key Points to Consider

  • ๐Ÿ—จ๏ธ "Most definitely wonโ€™t go anywhere" - Critics are wary of bipartisan challenges.

  • ๐Ÿ” Proposed COIN Act broadens the scope to include family members of officials.

  • ๐Ÿ”ป Strong resistance anticipated from the Republican-controlled Congress.

  • ๐Ÿ”‘ "This sets a dangerous precedent" - A common refrain among opponents.

The COIN Act is poised to face serious hurdles in the legislative arena, with many believing it might only serve as a symbolic gesture rather than a genuine attempt at reform. If any change is to occur, a shift in political power post-election may be essential for true ethical standards to take root.