Home
/
Technology insights
/
Decentralized applications
/

Seeking a multichain dex for trustless btc to eth swaps

Users Call for True Multichain DEX | Swapping BTC for ETH Remains Elusive

By

Markus Zhang

Oct 2, 2025, 10:11 AM

2 minutes reading time

A visual representation of a decentralized exchange interface showing Bitcoin and Ethereum logos with arrows indicating a swap transaction between them.
popular

Decentralized exchange solutions are facing criticism as users express frustration over the lack of options for swapping Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) directly. Multiple people are questioning the ability of existing platforms to facilitate true decentralized trading without reverting back to centralized services.

The Challenge of Cross-Chain Swaps

Many crypto enthusiasts are eager to fully abandon centralized exchanges (CEXs), but the options for decentralized exchanges (DEXs) seem limited. Platforms like Uniswap are restricted to ERC-20 tokens, while others, including Jupiter, are exclusive to Solana. A significant concern revolves around the integrity of cross-chain swap sites, which many argue often lead users back to custodial services. "Everything Iโ€™ve found so far is stuck on its own chain," shared one disappointed trader.

Summing Up User Experience

Users have shared their struggles, with a consistent theme emerging: the desire for a straightforward, trustless swap.

  • When asked about existing solutions, some commenters recommended Rubic Exchange and Symbiosis Swap, citing simplicity and multi-chain support.

  • One user highlighted a DEX that offers a fully on-chain order book, though specifics were scarce.

  • "Check out Itโ€™s got a fully on-chain order book DEX," another user advised, reflecting the mixed responses regarding available options.

"Iโ€™m trying to fully ditch CEXs, but the one missing piece is a proper DEX that supports Bitcoin," lamented a user, highlighting the ongoing demand for a reliable multichain alternative.

Mixed Responses from the Community

The sentiment within the community leans towards frustration but is tempered with some optimism regarding emerging platforms. While many lament the current state of decentralized exchanges, thereโ€™s a hopeful push for innovation.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿš€ "Many not sure if you actually searched" - highlighting the ongoing exploration for user-friendly platforms.

  • ๐ŸŒ Users show interest in various platforms, such as Symbiosis Swap and Rubic Exchange for potential solutions.

  • โš–๏ธ Concerns about the authenticity of cross-chain swaps remain prevalent, with many skeptical of custodial redirects.

The demand for a decentralized solution capable of handling BTC and ETH swaps remains strong. Will developers rise to meet this challenge? Only time will tell.

The Road Ahead for Decentralized Swaps

There's a significant chance that developers will accelerate efforts to create reliable multichain DEX platforms in response to growing frustrations among the crypto community. As demand for seamless BTC to ETH swaps intensifies, innovative solutions could emerge, potentially increasing the failure rate of existing platforms that cannot adapt. Experts estimate that in the next 12 months, we could see at least three new multichain DEXs gaining traction, driven by the need for trustless transactions. The constant push from the crypto enthusiasts for better alternatives may eventually lead to established projects rethinking their strategies to include cross-chain capabilities, creating a more competitive landscape hard to ignore.

Historical Echoes in Financial Innovation

Looking back to the early days of online banking in the late 1990s, many consumers were hesitant to fully embrace digital transactions due to trust issues with security and dependency on third parties. Yet, as technologies improved and people demanded better, more intuitive systems, original banking institutions adapted to provide better services online. This sent ripples across the financial world. Much like the current situation with multichain DEXs, the resolve for decentralized exchange solutions may force traditional models to transform for survival in an increasingly competitive market.