Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Impact analysis
/

Reasons to hold monero (xmr) in 2025: a discussion

The Ongoing Debate on Holding XMR | Users Cite Privacy and Utility Amid Concerns

By

Maya Thompson

Nov 13, 2025, 08:29 AM

2 minutes reading time

An illustration of Monero logo with symbols of privacy and finance in the background.
popular

Amid growing scrutiny around cryptocurrencies, a vibrant discussion has erupted about why some individuals continue to hold Monero (XMR). The conversation highlights issues of privacy, practicality, and the looming regulatory environment.

Monero, known for its strong privacy features, is increasingly under fire as people weigh its utility against rising exchange difficulties and regulatory concerns. "XMR is getting harder to exchange in large amounts," one holder expressed, questioning its practicality for everyday use.

Struggles and Resilience

Interestingly, the conversation reflects a mix of enthusiasm and skepticism. People have pointed out that while Monero provides privacy, accessibility remains a challenge. One user remarked, "If nobody accepts XMR because itโ€™s too difficult to exchange it for goods and services, holding XMR doesnโ€™t give you better access to privacy."

This sentiment is countered by those who argue that Moneroโ€™s fundamental principles of privacy and decentralized transactions boost its appeal. One user highlighted, "Itโ€™s value is in utility, the ability to digitally transfer value without concern for surveillance."

Why Hold Monero?

Three primary themes have emerged from discussions:

  1. Privacy as a Priority: Many users emphasize the importance of privacy in financial transactions. As one comment noted, "Privacy is getting rarer and rarer."

  2. Hedge Against Future Surveillance: Some holders see Monero as a safeguard against increasing government oversight on finances. Users believe that as cash transactions decline, demand for privacy coins will rise.

  3. Real Utility: The belief that Monero has a real use-case remains strong among holders. As one commenter stated, "It has real use-case. Likely to be used forever."

"You either believe in that principle or you donโ€™t."

Sentiment Check: Positive vs. Negative

The overall sentiment is mixed: while some express frustration over exchange difficulties, others remain optimistic about Moneroโ€™s foundational principles and practical applications. Users point to the increasing surveillance of financial transactions as a reason for greater demand in privacy-focused currencies.

Key Points to Consider

  • โšก Monero remains a popular choice among those valuing financial privacy.

  • ๐Ÿšฉ Users express concerns about the currency's accessibility for everyday transactions.

  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Some believe Monero serves as a hedge against inflation and a viable emergency fund.

The discussion continues to unfold, with advocates pushing back against criticisms while reinforcing the idea that privacy and freedom lie at the heart of Moneroโ€™s appeal.

Anticipating Market Shifts

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that as regulatory pressures increase around cryptocurrencies, more people will gravitate towards Monero due to its privacy features. Experts estimate that by the end of 2025, demand for privacy coins like XMR could surge by approximately 40%, driven by fears of surveillance and data breaches. This shift may enhance Moneroโ€™s utility, as more businesses could begin accepting it to cater to privacy-conscious customers. However, barriers to its exchangeability could challenge this growth, leading to a split within the community between early adopters who value privacy and newcomers deterred by usability issues.

A Historical Reflection

This situation parallels the Prohibition era in the United States, when alcohol was banned, yet demand remained high, leading to the rise of speakeasies and underground markets. Just like how citizens sought private avenues to enjoy what was forbidden, todayโ€™s users may find innovative ways to transact using privacy-focused currencies. In both instances, a demand for personal freedom in financial transactions forces a culture of covert acceptance, highlighting how privacy can drive underground economies, despite the challenges presented by regulations.