Edited By
Clara Johnson
A growing number of cryptocurrency investors are voicing concerns about missing hex tokens from their Rabby wallets. As of April 5, 2025, users report they’ve found no trace of their coins in recent transactions, heightening anxieties about asset security and network adjustments.
While Rabby wallet continues to support Ethereum, it has removed direct support for PulseChain. Users must now manually add PulseChain as a custom network and input token details. This shift adds complexity and uncertainty for many, leading to a mix of frustration and confusion within the community. The divide between those who can navigate these changes and those left in the dark is widening.
Many affected users first noticed discrepancies with their hex tokens, including one reporting, "I have 200,000 hex missing from Rabby." Another user lamented, "Sucks. I liked using Rabby. I'm switching to other wallets."
Interestingly, some users have found alternative solutions, such as importing seed phrases into other wallets like OKX Wallet and utilizing dapps linked to PulseChain. Still, the lack of clarity remains a sticking point, especially for those trying to track down their assets.
This issue appears to highlight three main themes in user feedback:
The struggle with the wallet's reduced functionality.
Suggestions for alternative wallet solutions.
Confusion over how to manage missing tokens.
Reports suggest a predominantly negative sentiment towards Rabby’s recent changes. As the tides shift, many lamented their choice to use Rabby, instead looking to options like MetaMask for a temporary fix. One user, who remains hopeful, remarked, "It’s still usable but frustrating."
"It still works if you connect to a dapp like PulseChain, but doesn’t appear in the wallet, disgraceful," voiced one frustrated investor, summarizing the crux of the issue.
As the cryptocurrency world grapples with ongoing developments, users demand answers. The Rabby wallet controversy raises legitimate concerns over transaction transparency and support for emerging networks. Many are left pondering: What does this mean for the safety of their investments?
While some users adapted quickly, others find themselves struggling to keep track of their funds and seek clarity in a rapidly changing ecosystem. With anxiety running high, confidence in Rabby is waning.
△ A significant number of tokens reported missing, leading to worries over wallet security.
▼ User feedback suggests opting for wallet alternatives may be the key.
💬 "I’m temporarily using MetaMask again until I try alternatives." – Common concern.
As this developing story unfolds, users are encouraged to stay vigilant, share their experiences, and look into new wallet solutions to safeguard their investments in an ever-evolving landscape.
For further information, users can check links like CoinDesk and Ethereum's official guide for troubleshooting tips.
