Qubic's rise to a 37.52% hashrate has sparked intense discussions. While some endorse this move for network stability, others point to transaction delays and the role of solo miners complicating the narrative.
Recent user insights challenge prevailing assumptions surrounding Qubic's hashrate. A significant comment noted, "You can't ban mining pools, and you can't ban solo miners" This highlights the complexities involved in preventing a 51% attack and reflects a lack of deep understanding among some in the community.
Some individuals shared their experiences, indicating uncertainty about whether their participation in pools, such as Nanopool, contributes to issues surrounding the network. A concerned miner expressed this sentiment by saying, "I don't know if solomining would have any useful usage for the network." This raises questions about the effectiveness of mining strategies overall.
Transaction speed remains a pressing concern. Observers are vocal about the slow confirmation times often associated with empty blocks. A user noted, "They are mining empty blocks, so transactions are slightly slower to confirm," pointing to a possible negative aspect of increasing hashrate.
The economic sustainability of Qubicโs mining strategies is under scrutiny. Some people argue that a high hashrate concentration may not bring long-term benefits, while others advocate for the job creation aspect. As one commenter put it, "At least it creates jobs," suggesting a trade-off between mining practices and economic growth.
๐ A notable divide exists regarding the impact of Qubic's 37.52% hashrate.
๐ฌ "There is no economic advantage to a 51% attack," raises questions about motivations behind high hashrate.
โก Many people report frustration over slow transaction confirmations due to mining empty blocks.
With debates heating up across various forums, it appears Qubic's management of its mining strategy will continue to stir conversation in the cryptocurrency community.