Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Country specific laws
/

New york lawmaker proposes tax on crypto sales and transfers

New York Lawmaker Proposes Crypto Tax | A Move that Divides Opinions

By

Xavier Lee

Aug 16, 2025, 04:31 AM

Edited By

Lina Chen

3 minutes reading time

A New York lawmaker stands at a podium discussing a proposed tax on cryptocurrency sales and transfers, with financial charts in the background.
popular

A New York Assemblymember has introduced a bill for a 0.2% tax on digital asset transactions, including cryptocurrencies and NFTs. If passed, this legislation aims to fund substance abuse prevention programs in upstate New York, stirring a mix of support and pushback from the crypto community.

The Proposed Tax Legislation and Its Implications

Phil Steck, the Assemblymember behind Assembly Bill 8966, is calling for this excise tax to take effect immediately upon approval. Lawmakers aim to generate revenue from a booming sector, positioning New York City to potentially earn significant funds from transactions that are currently largely unregulated.

"Another push to milk the crypto sector for revenue," commented a user board member, reflecting the concerns many share about the motivations behind the tax.

Critics are vocal about the implications for digital finance. One comment stressed, "This is terrible for DeFi; it will raise costs and push adoption away," indicating fears that such policies might stifle innovation and adoption.

Controversial Views and Public Sentiment

The reactions are mixed among the community:

  • Revenue Generation: Some assert this tax could provide vital funding for public programs.

  • Industry Resistance: Many believe it indicates a lack of genuine support for blockchain technologies.

  • Public Sentiment: Comments reflect skepticism, arguing that these regulations stem from a desire to profit from crypto rather than support it.

While the bill must clear several legislative hurdles before becoming law, the initial reception suggests a contentious debate ahead. An industry insider commented, "Curiously, they never wanted crypto at first, but now they want a piece of it!"

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ“Š 0.2% Excise Tax proposed on digital asset transactions, including crypto and NFTs.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Funding Purpose: The revenue is intended to support substance abuse prevention programs.

  • ๐Ÿšง Legislative Process: The bill needs committee, Assembly, Senate, and governor approval to be enacted.

  • ๐Ÿ›‘ Community Reactions: Strong negativity surrounding the tax's potential impact on DeFi and innovation.

The evolving discussions around this proposed regulation signal a critical time for the cryptocurrency sector in New York. As lawmakers navigate the intricacies of digital finance, the future structure could set important precedents for the rest of the country.

What Lies Ahead for Crypto in New York?

Thereโ€™s a strong chance the proposed tax on digital assets ignites further legislative discussions this year. As the bill progresses through various committees, public sentiment will likely shape its fate. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that lawmakers will amend the tax structure to address concerns raised by the crypto community, leading to potential exemptions for smaller transactions or innovations in decentralized finance (DeFi). If passed, the tax could spark similar initiatives in other states, which would further complicate an already fragmented regulatory landscape. Meanwhile, any failure to light a path forward may prompt crypto businesses to relocate to more favorable environments, thereby impacting New Yorkโ€™s position as a financial leader.

A Lesson from History in New Regulations

Consider the rise of the internet in the late 1990s. Initially met with skepticism and heavy taxation proposals, the burgeoning tech industry faced pushback that threatened its growth. It wasn't until lawmakers recognized the potential for innovation and economic growth that substantial regulatory frameworks emerged. Just as the internet transformed commerce, so too can cryptocurrency reshape our understanding of financeโ€”if only policymakers can grasp the opportunity rather than viewing it solely as a revenue stream. The current debate echoes the past, as those who adapt early could reap the rewards while others may find themselves playing catch-up in an evolving digital economy.