Home
/
Technology insights
/
Crypto security
/

Evaluating the safety of meta mask for crypto in 2025

Is MetaMask Worth the Risk? | Users Voice Serious Concerns in 2025

By

Lucas Rodriguez

Jul 17, 2025, 04:45 PM

Edited By

Nina Evans

Updated

Jul 18, 2025, 06:42 PM

2 minutes reading time

A person looking at a computer screen displaying MetaMask interface with warning signs related to phishing attacks in the background.
popular

As phishing attacks escalate against MetaMask, many users are expressing frustration and growing worry about the platform's security for serious cryptocurrency transactions. This has ignited discussions across forums about whether it's time to switch to more reliable options.

User Experiences in Focus

Community feedback shows a concerning trend. Long-term users are openly questioning MetaMaskโ€™s reliability. One user stated, "Iโ€™ve used it for years, but Iโ€™m starting to wonder if it can handle serious DeFi transactions safely." Another expressed doubt, saying, "I switched to Best Wallet for better stability and multi-chain support without random glitches."

Growing Security Concerns

Users highlight that MetaMask poses various risks, notably its vulnerability to attacks. "Web based and prone to many attack vectors," warned a commenter, while others reported performance issues, including high CPU usage that slows down their computers. "The problem is that it uses over 100% of your CPU, causing instability on my whole computer," one frustrated user noted.

"Phishing attempts are relentlessโ€”I'm careful, but is it enough?" another participant questioned, underscoring the platform's target status due to its popularity.

Functional Critiques

The conversation takes a turn as some users seek alternatives, citing better functionality elsewhere. Comments reveal users are increasingly exploring options as they find MetaMask lacking.

"I donโ€™t use MetaMask anymore because many other wallets are just better," one user insisted.

User Advice and Best Practices

Thereโ€™s a shared sentiment among users to adopt best practices for security. Many are urging caution and best practices:

  • Avoid sharing your Secret Recovery Phrase.

  • Pair MetaMask with strong security tools.

One member suggested, "If youโ€™re going to use MetaMask, maintain awareness of phishing risks."

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿšจ Numerous users report performance issues and high CPU consumption.

  • ๐Ÿ” Phishing attempts are a significant concern for many.

  • ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ A preference for more stable wallet options is growing.

Whatโ€™s Next for MetaMask?

In light of rising security concerns within the crypto community in 2025, analysts predict an influx of users moving away from MetaMask. Itโ€™s estimated that about 30% may opt for alternative wallets this year. Given the continuous threats and users' desires for better protection and functionality, the future of MetaMask hangs in the balance.

As emerging technologies advance, the wallets market may shift, prompting MetaMask to enhance its security measures. For now, vigilance remains essential for users navigating the uncertain terrain of cryptocurrency.