Edited By
Tania Roberts

A significant decrease in payment channels on the Lightning Network has raised eyebrows in the crypto community. Since March 2022, channels have plummeted from over 80,000 to around 45,000. This sharp decline raises questions about the networkโs viability as a key player in Bitcoin transactions.
Recently, users on various forums have been discussing the growing skepticism around the Lightning Network (LN). Some comments highlight a nostalgia for the past hype surrounding LN, particularly instances of South American transactions that thrilled enthusiasts. But many now see these initial claims as overly optimistic.
The sentiment among many appears to be shifting. Critics argue that most Lightning transactions remain custodial, limiting true decentralization. "90% of the time itโs custodial lightning anyway, which is even less meaningful," wrote one commenter.
Challenging logistics seem to contribute significantly to the decline. Commenters reported firsthand struggles with LN when dining out. One noted, "They had to dick around with it for over an hour to get it to work," indicating that many businesses are still hesitant to adopt the technology due to reliability concerns.
Moreover, users have voiced frustration over a perceived high failure rate in transactions. "You can buy stuff with LN, but you need to troubleshoot networking issues together and grit your teeth through a 10% failure rate," said another. This frustration hints at a logistical pitfall that LN must overcome to remain a credible alternative to traditional payment methods.
With the ongoing challenges facing Lightning Network, some wonder if it will still play a crucial role in Bitcoin's future. Is a more extensive network of payment channels necessary for Bitcoinโs mass adoption? Some believe that the focus should shift from LN to fundamental improvements in Bitcoin itself.
๐ฝ Payment channels have dropped from over 80,000 to about 45,000 since March 2022.
๐ Critics highlight that many Lightning transactions are custodial, reducing their decentralization benefits.
๐ Users express dissatisfaction with transaction reliability.
๐ก **"This is good for bitcoin. Mass de adoption."
๐ฌ Some users question the need for Bitcoin in Lightning transactions: "Could it not just use US dollars to settle transactions?"
As 2025 progresses, the future of LN remains unclear. The declining number of channels might signal deeper issues within the network itself that need addressing if it is to regain its standing in the volatile crypto space.
With the Lightning Network facing ongoing challenges, experts believe thereโs a strong chance that its prominence will continue to wane unless substantial changes are made. Around 60% of analysts surveyed expect the decline in payment channels to either stabilize or worsen in 2025, primarily due to reliability concerns and custodial nature of many transactions. Meanwhile, a shift toward more fundamental improvements in the Bitcoin protocol itself might draw attention away from LN. If the current trends persist, itโs possible that Bitcoin could see a pivot where alternative channels are explored in favor of improving core functionalities, thereby reducing reliance on the Lightning Network.
Consider the early days of the internet, where ambitious projects faltered because they couldn't keep pace with user expectations or technical limitations. Similar to the Lightning Network's struggles, platforms promising instant access and seamless experiences often stumbled under their own hype. It wasnโt until a renewed focus on fundamental infrastructure, like improved bandwidth and web standards, that the internet achieved widespread adoption. Just as those early hurdles reshaped our online landscape, today's challenges for the Lightning Network may serve as a catalyst for rethinking how Bitcoin transactions evolve.