Home
/
Market news
/
Latest updates
/

Upgrade your crypto: ledger stops support for nano s

Ledger Ceases Support for Popular Nano S | Users Voice Concerns on Upgrading

By

Samantha Whitaker

Jun 27, 2025, 01:38 PM

Edited By

Jonathan Lee

3 minutes reading time

Graphic showing a Ledger Nano S wallet with a red cross, representing the end of support for this device
popular

A wave of frustration is sweeping through the crypto community as Ledger has announced it will stop support for its Nano S hardware wallet. With ongoing discussions about device reliability, many are questioning whether it's time to upgrade.

Context Behind the Decision

The Nano S, first introduced nearly a decade ago, was sunset in 2022 but continued to function. Users are growing increasingly wary of relying on a device that may soon lose compatibility with essential applications. One comment sums it up: "This is not a โ€˜set and forget itโ€™ type of device if Iโ€™m losing support for it over time."

Users facing a dilemma are debating whether to stick with the aging Nano S or consider alternatives. Interestingly, comments reveal that while some maintain trust in their current devicesโ€”"If you are just BTC, you can keep using the Nano S"โ€”others express a need to abandon ship amidst rising concerns about security and functionality.

User Reactions: A Mixed Bag

The sentiment is largely negative among commenters contemplating the implications of losing support. Key themes include:

  • Alternative Options: Several users hint at the desire for wallets beyond Ledger, reflecting on other platforms like Coinbase for ether storage.

  • Security Concerns: Many unite in warning against complacency, emphasizing that no hardware wallet is perfectly safe. "There is no 'set and forget it' device. Never has been"

  • Continued Use: Some insist the Nano S remains functional, provided users rely on proper safety measures, including maintaining a 24-word recovery phrase.

"This device has limitations, but with the recovery phrase, you can't lose access to your funds."

Upgrading from the Nano S

As users consider their next steps, the need for a modern device becomes apparent. Existing comments suggest looking at BIP39-compatible wallets for easier transitions. Despite the discontent, many remain pragmatic about the futureโ€”acknowledging that as technology advances, upgrades may simply be a part of digital asset management.

Key Takeaways

  • โœ“ Security Reminder: Always keep the recovery phrase secure and avoid sharing it.

  • โœ‰๏ธ Device Longevity: Though still usable, expect limited updates on the Nano S.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Explore Alternatives: Users are actively considering wallets beyond Ledger.

As the 2025 crypto environment continues to evolve, how will Ledger's decision impact users' trust in existing wallets?

Looking Forward: What's on the Horizon?

With Ledger's discontinuation of support for the Nano S, there's a strong chance that many people will look towards upgrading their wallets in the coming months. Experts estimate that as much as 60% of current Ledger users might transition to newer models or explore alternative brand options by mid-2025. This shift could drive demand for wallets that not only offer better security but also enhanced user experiences. Furthermore, with the crypto landscape evolving rapidly, the emphasis on compatibility and security will likely push developers to innovate, creating more robust solutions for digital asset management.

The Ripple Effect: Lessons from the Past

A thought-provoking parallel can be drawn from the evolution of personal computers in the late 1990s when many users hesitated to transition from their trusted machines to more advanced, albeit unfamiliar, systems. Much like today's crypto users, the reluctance stemmed from fear of losing data and comfort with existing technology. Just as those users eventually embraced updatesโ€”leading to a thriving digital worldโ€”crypto enthusiasts may find themselves compelled to evolve past outdated wallets. The need for greater security in a dynamic market will mirror that transitional phase, with the current discomfort prompting future technological advancements.