
A wave of questions about the Trezor 7 hardware wallet continues as its release date approaches. The crypto community is abuzz, with some users raising concerns about the deviceโs security and potential functionality gaps, particularly its dual secure elements and battery longevity.
While many are excited about the enhanced features, others are skeptical. A user asked, "Why two secure elements in 7? Isnโt the new open-source one enough?" This points to potential security issues regarding the closed secure element. Concerns over a possible backdoor in the second component linger, prompting many to wonder how this affects the overall security of the device.
Additionally, discussions about connectivity options for MetaMask have emerged. One individual inquired, "When will you get connectivity through MetaMask on cell phones?" This highlights the community's desire for seamless interaction with existing platforms.
The desire for a feature similar to Ledgerโs Recovery Key surfaced in comments. A user asked, "Any thoughts on implementing this feature in future products?" This reflects a growing expectation for user-friendly recovery options. Meanwhile, queries about the expected release date for the green Safe 7 model were also noted, showing heightened anticipation among buyers.
Some current Trezor users, sensing the impending arrival of advanced models, are facing buyer's remorse. One user recently purchased a Model T, only to question its longevity, asking, "How many years' worth of use does it have left?"
"Why no LATAM shipping for this model specifically?" queried another user, revealing shipping concerns that could limit access for certain markets.
๐ Security concerns about dual secure elements and backdoor risks remain prominent
๐ฑ Community questions indicate a strong desire for integration with apps like MetaMask
โฐ Discussions about the longevity of existing Trezor models reveal potential buyer hesitations
In summary, as fascination with Trezor 7 builds, the dialogue reflects significant anxieties about security and future compatibility. These discussions reveal a community navigating between excitement for new features and concern over existing vulnerabilities.