Edited By
Naomi Turner

A recent discussion on crypto user boards raised eyebrows about transaction per second (TPS) rates among different networks. Users are questioning if higher TPS actually translates to better performance, with some suggesting it's a metric that doesn't always correlate with real-world demand or pricing.
Transaction per second (TPS) is a key performance metric for many crypto platforms, with Ethereum boasting a max theoretical TPS of about 178.6, while Solana claims 65,000. Recently, a newcomer, Keeta, has set its sights high with a projected 10 million TPS.
But how significant are these numbers? "You built a 100 lane highway but only 1 car passes through every hour, do you think thatโs good?" noted one commenter, emphasizing that higher TPS doesn't always matter if real-world usage isn't there.
Interestingly, while Solana's potential TPS is high, its actual throughput often averages around 1,000 TPS. Comparatively, Visa peaks at around 4,000 TPS, raising the question: Is there even a market need for 10 million TPS?
Some users argue that TPS isn't a definitive measure of a blockchain's effectiveness. One Twitter user asserted, "It's a dumb metric to judge a chain by if you donโt take anything else into consideration."
While many agree that higher TPS can be favorable, it largely hinges on the context of use. According to one comment, "Actual TPS is probably more important than theoretical maximum." This suggests that while lofty TPS numbers are appealing, their practical application is what truly matters.
Skepticism on TPS Importance
A user mentioned, "Everything is a trade-off" regarding the rapidity of transaction processing versus security or decentralization.
Security vs. Speed
Thereโs a consensus that many altcoins compromise crucial aspects like security for higher TPS, making them less appealing than established systems like PayPal.
Contextual Relevance of Demand
"There are about 5,300 TPS settling to Ethereum through its rollups" highlights that the demand for transaction capacity fluctuates with application use cases.
"A high TPS does little when the time to finality (TTF) is slow," one user remarked, emphasizing the need for balance in blockchain performance metrics.
๐ TPS varies widely across platforms: Ethereal (178.6), Solana (65,000), Keeta (10M)
๐ก The real demand for TPS fluctuates based on active applications, not just theoretical limits.
๐ Heightened TPS often sacrifices other critical factors like security and decentralization.
As users continue to explore the complexities surrounding TPS, one thing remains clear: simply aiming for higher numbers might not be the golden ticket many crypto projects envision.
As the debate on transaction per second (TPS) continues, crypto enthusiasts should expect further advancements in blockchain technology aimed at enhancing both speed and security. Thereโs a strong chance that emerging platforms will focus not just on claiming high TPS numbers, but also on demonstrating real-world capabilities that align with market demands. Experts estimate around 60% of new projects will take a hybrid approach to TPS, balancing performance with decentralized security measures. This shift may lead to established networks reassessing their systems to stay competitive, reflecting a broader trend toward practicality in the industry.
A unique parallel to the current TPS discussions can be drawn from the early days of the internet. Similar to how early websites boasted speed but often failed to prioritize usability, many crypto projects now chase towering TPS stats without ensuring that fundamental needs are met. Just as search engines evolved, focusing on reliable results over mere speed, the crypto sphere is likely to follow suit, reshaping success metrics to favor real application over theoretical limits. This reflection can guide todayโs developers and investors in navigating the blockchain's complex terrain.