Edited By
Aisha Khatun

A growing number of people are raving about Hyperliquid, pointing to its smooth operation and low fees. However, some remain skeptical, highlighting its newness and liquidity challenges.
Many people have found Hyperliquid to be unexpectedly user-friendly. Users describe execution as instant with a clean interface reminiscent of centralized exchanges (CEXs). One user stated, "Yes, best app in crypto." Reliable withdrawals have also been commonly noted.
Despite positive feedback, concerns linger around its liquidity. One comment emphasized that "some markets donโt have deep liquidity yet." As newer platforms often struggle with this issue, the longevity of Hyperliquid's success remains uncertain.
Some people are quick to mention limitations, particularly related to spot trading. A user pointed out that "It doesn't have stop loss/take profit for spot trading, so itโs completely useless for spot trading." This resonates with others who worry about the lack of confirmation popups when modifying orders, potentially leading to costly errors.
"If you want a fast, non-custodial perp exchange, itโs one of the better ones to try." - User feedback
Interestingly, thereโs a segment of users who believe in Hyperliquidโs potential because it operates as a transparent, permissionless CEX while generating significant revenue. They mention that almost all the revenue returns to HYPE holders, creating incredible economics for them. The mention of Hyperliquid's Layer 1 (L1) capabilities adds another layer to its appeal, as it may help reduce certain risks associated with its assets.
โ Many praise Hyperliquid for its smooth and fast operation.
โ Questions remain about its market depth and liquidity concerns.
๐ซ Limitations in trading features may deter spot traders.
As people continue to experiment with Hyperliquid, the outcome of its innovations remains to be seen. Can it balance user expectations with the realities of a young platform? Only time will tell.
Looking ahead, thereโs a strong chance that as Hyperliquid gains traction, it may fine-tune its liquidity issues. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that increased user adoption will lead to improved market depth, especially if the team behind Hyperliquid addresses current concerns about limited trading features. Additionally, partnerships with established liquidity providers could accelerate its growth. However, if the platform continues to struggle with these issues, it might limit user engagement and hinder its potential to compete with more established exchanges.
In a way, the current situation with Hyperliquid evokes the early days of decentralized applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. Much like the first wave of dApps, where early adopters had to confront both innovation and execution hurdles, Hyperliquid stands at a similar crossroads. The fast-paced environment of those early projects often allowed the most adaptable developers to thrive, while others fell by the wayside. As Hyperliquid evolves, it could reflect a similar trajectory, where responsiveness to user needs and market conditions will determine whether it emerges as a leader in this new decentralized trading frontier.