Edited By
Carlos Ramirez

A growing conversation around HBAR is captivating the crypto community, particularly regarding its potential to address pressing issues in artificial intelligence. Some believe HBAR could be a game-changer, while others dismiss it as mere jargon.
Various comments on HBARโs potential as a trust layer for AI systems have emerged. Supporters claim it could revolutionize how we handle AIโs complexities, stating that the technology allows for pinpointing corrupted bots within large networks, akin to identifying a bad gene in DNA.
One user remarked, > "If thereโs a bad bot in the strand, you can pinpoint the corrupted bot amongst the tens of thousands of AI bots in a program."
However, skepticism runs deep. Critics question if HBAR's technology is relevant. Many argue that the current AI market isn't ready for such a leap, with an insistence that most AI companies are still figuring out profitability while advocating for deregulation. One commenter bluntly stated, "Youโre falling for the lamest buzzwords ever."
The dialogue reflects three main concerns:
Profitability of AI
Experts suggest that AI development is not yet profitable, casting doubt on whether companies will invest in HBAR technology.
Complexity Overload
Many users highlight how complex terms are leading to misunderstanding rather than clarity.
Future Growth Predictions
Despite the mixed reception, some remain optimistic about HBARโs future, with predictions suggesting it could reach $10 by 2035.
๐ "This sets a new standard for verifiable governance" - a user commented on HBARโs governance potential.
๐ HBAR could serve as a solution, but doubts persist about its immediate application in todayโs AI-driven market.
โ ๏ธ Concerns about AI profitability could hinder HBARโs intended reach.
The ongoing debate showcases the divide in perception about HBARโs role in the future of AIโa subject that's bound to continue generating buzz in the crypto community. Is HBAR poised to turbocharge AI development, or are these aspirations merely reflective of hope in a field marked by uncertainty?
Thereโs a strong chance that HBAR will play a crucial role in bridging the gap between AIโs current limitations and future possibilities. As AI companies seek more reliable frameworks, experts estimate around 60% of them could consider implementing HBAR advancements by 2030. This potential adoption could pressurize competitors to innovate quickly, possibly leading to a surge in AI profitability as companies look for legacies in verifiable governance and trust within AI systems. However, if skepticism about HBAR's immediate applicability continues, the momentum may stall.
The atmosphere surrounding HBAR recalls the early days of the internet, where many dismissed its relevance while a few saw its massive potential. Companies like Amazon and Google started small but paved the way for an entirely new economy. Just as HBAR could catalyze advancements in AI, the internet was once just a concept with limited understanding. People brushed off the excitement as fleeting, similar to today's skepticism surrounding HBARโs role in AI. The key takeaway is that those who embrace innovation today may shape the future by leveraging HBAR, just as tech visionaries did decades ago.