Edited By
Sofia Gomez
A shift in the culture of hackathons has ignited debate among tech enthusiasts. In 2025, many people question the value of hackathons now that AI tools dominate the development landscape. As participants struggle to distinguish their contributions, some argue that the focus has steered away from creativity and problem-solving.
Hackathons are traditionally viewed as testing grounds for innovation and collaboration. However, comments echo a growing sentiment that they now serve as platforms for showcasing AI capabilities. One commenter pointed out, "AI prompt skills are hyped right now," indicating a belief that speed and convenience overshadow substance in these events.
These competitive environments often spill over into professional networks like LinkedIn, where the tone has understandably soured. "LinkedIn is trash; it used to be bad with lunatics posting exaggerated stories, now itโs AI-generated made-up stories," one member spilled out, highlighting frustration with disingenuous content. Others share this sentiment, calling hackathons mere flexing events that mislead people about real technical talents.
The essence of innovation appears muddied in today's hackathon scene. A user remarked, "It's like a business ideaโwhoever has the best idea wins now," showcasing how judging criteria have evolved significantly. Many hackathons now prioritize ideas over functioning products, which raises questions about the merit of tech expertise in a world increasingly reliant on AI.
"Strategize with the AI," suggested another participant, emphasizing reliance on technology rather than original coding.
Some argue that despite the prevalence of AI, thereโs still a need for human insight. Comments reflect a belief that individual input remains crucial. As one person stated, "Youโve still gotta prompt your way to greatness; just because AI is here doesnโt mean you gotta be complacent."
On the other hand, some participants feel intimidated, judging their contributions against those who leverage advanced AI tools. The competitive balance has altered, leading some seasoned developers to echo, "Unless you are a senior dev, an AI prompt will usually be faster."
๐ Emerging tensions between AI usage and creative ingenuity dominate discussions.
๐ก According to one comment, hackathons often reward creative ideas over fully functional products.
โ๏ธ "You've still gotta prompt your way to greatness" โ users emphasize that skills remain essential.
As hackathons evolve, what will be required to stand out in this new era? The future of these events hangs in the balance as people come to terms with the profound impact of AI.
Thereโs a strong chance hackathons will evolve into hybrid events that blend human creativity with AI efficiency. Experts estimate around 60% of participants may pivot to roles that enhance their AI prompt skills rather than traditional coding skills. This shift could redefine how competition is perceived, as DIY tech problems may take a backseat to showcasing unique concepts. As AI tools become more accessible, the emphasis on purely functional products may diminish further, leading to a new wave of hackathons that prioritize collaboration over competition, ensuring that original thought remains paramount in innovation.
The current landscape of hackathons may find an intriguing parallel in the Renaissance, a period where human insight flourished alongside newfound technology. Just as artists and thinkers learned to harness the printing press to spread ideas, todayโs developers may need to use AI as a tool to amplify creativity, rather than replace it. Similar to how Michelangeloโs genius transcended the mere act of sculpting through an understanding of his tools, today's programmers may emerge as visionaries by combining their unique human perspectives with the capabilities of AI, ensuring that the human touch remains irreplaceable in the tech realm.