Edited By
Emma Thompson
A Florida-based entrepreneur is stirring the pot with plans for an ETH treasury startup, launching with only 64 ETH and a lofty goal of going public. While they have a securities attorney prepping for an SEC filing, skepticism from the community looms large.
Starting a crypto-centric company usually requires a robust financial foundation. The entrepreneur claims to have 64 ETH ready for a new venture, attracting additional soft commitments from family and friends. However, the path to an IPO, particularly with only a few hundred ETH, has raised eyebrows. Critics point out that costs for compliance, insurance, and audits can easily total $1 million annually.
Some commentators have already labeled the initiative a scam.
Responses on forums have been fierce, highlighting three main themes:
Financial Viability: Many believe the financial model is unsustainable. A comment warned, "You want to try to file an S-1 and IPO a company with a few hundred ETH?"
Need for Expertise: The search for a US-based co-founder with expertise in IT and cybersecurity has drawn mixed responses. Some suggest a more business-oriented partner is necessary, with one comment stating, "You need someone that can raise funds," emphasizing the importance of strong networks.
Skepticism vs. Optimism: While many comments are negative, a few highlight the potential for success in the crypto treasury sector, referencing publicly traded crypto firms that have thrived.
"Issuing stock for a company backed by crypto treasuries is a playbook thatโs already succeeding,โ one user argued.
๐ด 64 ETH initial investment raises eyebrows; many deem it insufficient.
๐ต Compliance costs could reach $1 million annually post-IPO.
๐ก Positive outlook from some users on potential of crypto treasury firms.
The entrepreneur is calling for recommendations on co-founders with the right skill set, emphasizing the need for someone engaged and experienced in management. Are they setting themselves up for success or failure?
Thereโs a strong chance that the entrepreneur may struggle to secure the necessary backing for a successful launch. Given that many doubters are questioning the viability of relying solely on 64 ETH, experts estimate around a 70% possibility that the startup will face significant hurdles in attracting investors. Additionally, with compliance and auditing costs projected at $1 million a year, the financial demands could overwhelm the initial investment, leaning toward a likely pivot or partnership with a more seasoned co-founder. Without key expertise and robust funding strategies, the dream of going public could quickly dissipate, leading to a reevaluation of the business model within the next 12 months.
Consider how the early days of the personal computer revolution mirrored this scenario. Visionaries like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates began with far more than just initial capital; they had networks and technical prowess that fueled their success. The founding of Microsoft and Apple werenโt solely about the moneyโthey were also about timing, market understanding, and an unyielding belief in innovation. Similarly, this entrepreneur's fate hangs not only on their 64 ETH but primarily on their ability to rally expertise and create a credible narrative that resonates within a skeptical market. Just as those tech pioneers understood the landscape and navigated through uncertainties, this venture will require savvy and assertive strategies to turn doubters into believers.