Home
/
Technology insights
/
Crypto security
/

Are fake subscribers ruining online engagement?

Limited engagement in a community with thousands of subscribers has raised eyebrows among people. Comments point to a mix of inactive accounts and individuals merely observing the discussions, leading to concerns about the authenticity of engagement metrics.

By

Ethan White

Jul 1, 2025, 02:44 PM

Edited By

Lina Chen

Updated

Jul 2, 2025, 04:41 AM

2 minutes reading time

An illustration showing digital bots alongside human figures, representing the gap between subscriber numbers and real engagement on forums.
popular

Unpacking the Discrepancy

Itโ€™s baffling how a thread can have such high subscriber numbers yet yield minimal interaction. One contributor commented, "Many people love Nano, but so many lost interest due to the price action." This illustrates a trend of dedicated holders retreating into the shadows, their interest dormant but not extinguished.

Lurkers vs. Participants

Analysis of the comments reveals a sizeable group of older accounts, likely inactive for years. A user noted, "They subscribed 8 years ago," reflecting a historical absence of interaction. However, the notion that real, active humans exist among the crowd is underscored by another community member: "Real humans, definitely hibernating in this sub". It seems many are waiting for upward movement in price to re-engage fully.

The Current Community Activity

Current activities show that only around 5,000 to 15,000 subscribers are estimated as active. Popular posts are seeing paltry responses of around 100 to 400 upvotes. Market conditions contribute to this lull, as many anticipate a surge in interest once the crypto market rebounds. "By the time XNO starts moving, this thread will see WAY more activity," expressed one hopeful commenter.

"It ainโ€™t much, but itโ€™s honest work,โ€ captured a lurking user's sentiment, highlighting the tension between passivity and participation.

What Lies Ahead?

The future remains uncertain for community engagement. Many people ponder whether rising market interest will trigger significant interaction. As several commenters suggest, the latent enthusiasm for the tech behind cryptocurrencies remains intact, indicating potential for revived discussions.

Key Insights

  • โ–ณ Estimated active subscribers stand at 5K-15K.

  • โ–ฝ Many accounts are likely outdated or inactive.

  • โ€ป "Real humans definitely hibernating" reflects a common view on engagement.

Even with interactions sparse, there's hope for renewal in the community's dynamic. If the crypto market begins to climb, anticipations grow for a surge of activity, reminiscent of the shifts observed in thriving forums of the past.

Epilogue: Winds of Change Ahead?

As optimism builds, should we expect the cycle of hibernation to conclude? Only time will tell, but signs point toward a potential resurgence in community engagement as interests realign with market trends.