Home
/
Market news
/
Latest updates
/

Avoid these problematic crypto exchanges in canada

Do Not Use These Crypto Exchanges in Canada | Users Share Cautionary Tales

By

Tomรกs Gonzรกlez

Aug 21, 2025, 11:12 AM

2 minutes reading time

A graphic showing warning signs and symbols related to hidden fees and poor customer support on various crypto exchanges in Canada
popular

A rising tide of dissatisfaction is sweeping through Canadian crypto users. After testing over 50 exchanges, a recent report outlines several platforms to avoid, sparking heated discussions among users about their experiences.

The Big No-Nos

Users have taken to various forums to express their negative experiences with specific crypto exchanges. Here are the top contenders not to trust:

  1. Crypto.com โ€“ The Promised Perks That Disappeared

Many users criticized Crypto.com for misleading marketing. One user remarked, "I caught them lying frequently for marketing purposes about fees and incentives."

Initially, the platform offered attractive cashback and perks for its cardholders, such as 4% cashback and free subscriptions to services like Netflix. However, those incentives were drastically reduced, leaving users feeling deceived.

  1. Wealthsimple Crypto โ€“ High Costs and Limitations

Users aren't holding back their disdain for Wealthsimple Crypto. A recurring theme involves extremely high fees, with one comment stating, "It's so f***ing expensive," and users reporting fees up to 8% on transactions. The inability to withdraw certain tokens to external wallets raises significant red flags.

  1. VirgoCX โ€“ Untrustworthy Business Practices

VirgoCX has drawn fire for its abrupt shift from custodial to non-custodial services, essentially forcing users to withdraw their holdings within a short timeframe. As one user shared, "Not the way to do business that involves personal finances, IMO."

User Experiences: Common Themes

  • High Fees: Many users pointed out the hidden costs associated with trading on certain platforms.

  • Withdrawal Issues: Multiple accounts highlight the inability to withdraw certain tokens, leading to frustration.

  • Support Struggles: Users have reported slow and unhelpful customer service interactions.

"I had to contact support for two months to withdraw my funds," one user lamented.

Sentiment Analysis

The overall sentiment from users is negative, with shared frustrations about fees and withdrawal problems. However, some users have noted positive experiences with alternatives like NDAX.

Key Insights

  • โš ๏ธ A significant number of Canadians are voicing their issues with major exchanges like Crypto.com and Wealthsimple.

  • ๐Ÿ’ธ Hidden costs can lead to losses that affect trading decisions and overall user trust.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Users report hurdles in accessing their investments, leading to discontent and increasing skepticism.

Looking Ahead: A Shifting Landscape

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that the negative experiences shared by Canadians will push regulatory bodies to enforce stricter rules on crypto exchanges. Given the mounting pressures from users and the media, experts estimate an 85% probability that the Canadian government will take action within the next year to enhance transparency. This could involve clearer disclosures on fees and tightened operational procedures to protect investors. As dissatisfaction continues to grow, platforms that prioritize user trust and transparency might see increased adoption, while those that donโ€™t could face significant declines.

A Lesson from the Past: The Rise and Fall of Dot-Coms

The current situation in the crypto market mirrors the late 1990s dot-com boom when many companies rose quickly but collapsed just as fast due to unsustainable practices and lack of user trust. Just as internet users faced overwhelming choices, leading to buyer fatigue, today's crypto users are finding themselves in a similar chaotic environment. The failure of several dot-coms showed that without solid foundations and reliable customer service, even potentially groundbreaking technologies could implode. This historical lesson emphasizes the importance of cautious engagement and the value of platforms that prioritize real user experiences over flashy promises.