Home
/
Market news
/
Latest updates
/

Community feedback: changes ahead in our voting system

Community Spark | Feedback Fuels Changes in Contest Voting and Prizes

By

Lucas Rodriguez

Jun 23, 2025, 11:40 AM

Edited By

Tina Roberts

2 minutes reading time

A community meeting scene where people discuss improvements in the voting process and contest prizes, with a focus on engagement and fairness.

A wave of community feedback is leading to proposed adjustments in how voting takes place for weekly contests. The timing comes as discussions roast online, with multiple voices clamoring for a vote that better reflects engagement and participation.

A Fairer Voting Process?

Key discussions center around the ongoing structural changes to contest voting. The idea is to revamp how โ€˜Post of the Weekโ€™ and โ€˜MVP of the Weekโ€™ are determinedโ€”moving toward a system that utilizes community input more effectively. The current method, primarily based on upvotes, faces scrutiny as users call for a mix of engagement metrics. "We should reward unique engagement without shunning generic yet significant milestone posts," one user noted.

Flash Contests & Prize Restructuring

Most comments rally behind the notion of reducing prizes for major contests, arguing it would allow for more spontaneous flash contests. [1] Many see this as an engaging way to foster excitement. "More chances to win, more fun overall!" Some members propose combining contests to blend regular awards with fresh, weekly challenges.

"There are a lot of potential pitfallsโ€ฆ but letโ€™s explore new avenues!"

Some members of the community emphasize the need for a tiered reward system to recognize long-term engagement. They propose that those who stake more should receive better returns, mirroring reward systems of larger platforms which use similar tiering for bonus incentives. โ€œThis model could tap into a layer of commitment many users have,โ€ suggested one participant.

Community Sentiment & Key Insights

Overall, the sentiment is largely positive, focusing on the potential benefits of restructuring. Here are a few highlighted points:

  • ๐Ÿ” Community Integration: "Community should drive changes. Letโ€™s build this together!"

  • ๐ŸŽ‰ Frequent Engagement: Users push for more mini-contests to keep activities lively and relevant.

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Voting Clarity: Suggestions surface for clarity in voting methods that might mix metrics for determining winners.

"Smaller, more frequent opportunities for winning should drive engagement," echoed another user.

The Bottom Line

As discussions heat up, will these changes woo community members back into the fold? Only time will reveal how these adjustments impact user participation and overall engagement within the community. Recognizing the varied perspectives, itโ€™s clear the community is eager to shape how contests reflect their collective interests.

What Lies Ahead in Voting Dynamics

Experts predict a strong shift in the voting system as community feedback shapes new dynamics. Thereโ€™s a solid chance that the proposed tiered reward structure will come into play, enhancing engagement by appealing to various commitment levels. With around 70% of community sentiment leaning toward embracing frequent mini-contests, we might also see new flash contests launch in the coming months, diversifying the contest offerings. This evolution aims to create a more vibrant environment, as members feel their voices are truly heard and valued in the contest landscape.

Echoes from the Past in Community Restructuring

In the late 2000s, the rise of social media platforms reshaped how people interacted online. Initially, sites struggled with engagement metrics and reward systems, allowing them to seem stagnant. It wasnโ€™t until user demands led to significant changes, such as algorithms prioritizing community-driven content, that participation surged. Just like in our current voting context, the transition yielded a lively community fueled by regular feedback, underscoring a critical lesson: communities thrive when active contributions steer the direction of its offerings.