Coinbase is pursuing U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approval to introduce stocks based on blockchain technology. This effort is generating mixed reactions among people, stirring concerns over investor safety and market implicationsโespecially given past blockchain settlement failures.
Many people question the necessity of blockchain stocks, particularly since fractional shares are already available on various platforms. One commenter expressed frustration: "Why is this needed? We can already buy fractional shares on various investment platforms. If you are buying fractional shares, settlement times are typically not the issue. What even is this?"
Similar skepticism is reflected in ongoing discussions across forums. Concerns center on whether this move could expose retail investors to higher risks. As one bluntly stated, "It'll be literally like the South Park scene: AND IT'S GONE!"
The regulatory landscape is essential as the SEC weighs this application. Thereโs a growing fear that the commission might miss a critical opportunity to regulate a potential "Pandora's Box" of risks. Some commentators expressed dissatisfaction with the concept:
"Wow! So I donโt actually get to hold my securities directly and I get the fun of portfolio watching 24/7!? Fraudulent fuckers."
Critics argue this could lead to increased speculation, noting the speculative nature of linking shares to cryptocurrencies. Others question the legitimacy of digital assets like USDC, wondering how long this new funding model can last.
While some view this initiative as a step forward in stock ownership, others completely reject the idea, citing security issues and market stability. A commenter highlighted the practical implications: "Good idea. Then you can own the literal shares, and need to store it safely so youโre not robbed. Just like in the past."
๐ฅ Many people believe blockchain stocks could put retail investors at risk.
โ "Isn't this bearer shares?" raises questions on ownership.
๐ "Fraudulent fuckers," echoes a strong negative sentiment regarding the project's trustworthiness.
As Coinbase continues its bid for SEC approval, the divide among people remains clear, reflecting broader anxiety within the crypto community. The stakes are high; will regulators act in favor of market stability?
Experts estimate around a 60% probability of the SEC approving Coinbaseโs proposal, driven by rising interest in blockchain technology. However, if regulators push ahead without addressing community concerns, retail investors might plunge in without fully understanding the risks involved.
This could lead to scenarios where substantial losses occur, mirroring historical mistakes in the crypto domain, as echoed by many fearful of repeating the past.
A relevant parallel can be drawn from the early days of commercial aviation. When it first took off, safety standards were lacking, causing many accidents as people boarded flights with minimal understanding of the dangers. Over time, regulations were imposed to protect travelers, shaping the robust aviation industry we see today.
Similarly, the blockchain sector stands at a critical juncture โ it must balance technological innovation with investor protection. The journey of blockchain stocks could very well follow the evolution of aviation, where ambition and caution coexist.