Edited By
Omar Khan
A shocking incident has shed light on potential security issues at Coinbase. An Australian user reports a $7,000 AUD loss from their account due to an unauthorized transaction originating from a dormant API key created in 2017. The user, who discovered the transaction on January 1, 2025, experienced a frustrating three-month wait for supportโonly to have their ticket closed without resolution.
The individual, who preferred to remain anonymous, expressed disbelief after realizing that the API key, inactive for over seven years, was still valid. No alerts or two-factor authentication notifications were triggered prior to the withdrawal of Bitcoin to an unknown external wallet.
"This feels like a systemic security failure and not just 'user error,'" the user stated, reflecting a sentiment echoed by others in the community.
After the incident, the user opened a support ticket with Coinbase, but for over three months, they received only vague, generic responses. Ultimately, Coinbase's team closed the case, attributing the blame to the account holder for not securing the API key.
Commenters on various forums echoed shared frustrations:
"Coinbaseโs customer support is criminally bad."
"Why would an API key remain unrotated for eight years? Thatโs irresponsible!"
Many users noted the lack of action from Coinbase in addressing these issues and raised questions about their internal security.
Adding to the userโs distress, recent reports indicated that Coinbase had suffered a major security incident, exposing sensitive customer data. This revelation has intensified calls for better regulations and security measures within the cryptocurrency sector.
The impacted user has taken steps to report the matter to AUSTRAC and is considering escalation with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) and ASIC. However, a major hurdle lies in the fact that Coinbase is not AFCA-registered, complicating the complaint process.
โณ Dormant API keys pose significant risks, as shown in this case.
โฝ Support from Coinbase reportedly lacks adequacy; users are left frustrated.
โป "Who allows an API key to remain active for years without review?" asked another user.
As discussions unfold in online forums, many individuals are urged to review their own account security measures. The community hopes sharing these experiences will raise awareness about potential vulnerabilities in cryptocurrency platforms.
The question remains: how can users protect themselves in an environment that seems to allow unauthorized access with little recourse?
With growing outcry over security failures, itโs highly likely that Coinbase will face increased scrutiny from regulators. Experts estimate a 70% chance that new policies will emerge, mandating more rigorous security practices for cryptocurrency exchanges. Users may also start prioritizing platforms that offer better protective measures, shifting the market dynamics. Additionally, thereโs potential for lawsuits from affected users, which could compel Coinbase to enhance its customer support. The fallout from this incident may be a wake-up call for the industry, signaling a broader shift toward more secure trading environments.
A less obvious parallel can be seen in the early days of the internet, particularly around the turn of the century when countless web services faced security vulnerabilities. Many platforms allowed users to create accounts with minimal verification, leading to significant breaches that sparked outrage. Like the current case with Coinbase, these incidents forced companies to rethink security protocols and user safety measures. Just as those early breaches shaped the foundation of online security today, the fallout from this recent incident may pave the way for more robust protections in the evolving world of cryptocurrency.