Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Compliance updates
/

Changelly aml scam: $50,000 usdt transaction halted

Changelly Under Fire | User Coalition Protests $50,000 Transaction Freeze

By

Lydia Chen

Jul 6, 2025, 12:31 AM

Updated

Jul 7, 2025, 10:47 AM

2 minutes reading time

User frustrated with document requests after $50,000 USDT transaction was put on hold with Changelly
popular

A growing backlash against Changelly is intensifying as users voice frustration over a $50,000 USDT transaction that remains in limbo. Concerns over the exchange's operational transparency have users deliberating next steps amid unclear documentation demands.

Unexplained Transaction Freeze

Many people reported that their USDT transactions are stuck, further complicating their financial activities. Users highlighted requests for:

  • Government-issued ID

  • Face recognition

  • Employment details

  • Phone number

Requests for additional documents have been described as unreasonable. One participant mentioned, "Theyโ€™re asking about other incoming transfers in my wallet," which raises privacy concerns.

Another commentator shared their experience, stating they were asked for the original purchase invoice of their cryptocurrency after fulfilling earlier requests. This situation has prompted accusations of unethical practices from users who are increasingly hesitant to engage with the platform.

User Sentiment on Forums

A significant number of comments indicate a strong negative sentiment. A user expressed, "If you canโ€™t provide the origin of funds, what do you present?" revealing a sense of helplessness. Some users even shared accounts of prolonged holds, including one family member who faced a 10-month delay despite compliance with KYC requirements.

"They are known for holding users' funds for ridiculous reasons. Avoid using it," a frustrated commentator reflected.

The frustrations resonate deeply on community boards, where discussions about the companyโ€™s practices are widespread. Many users are wary of the KYC process, seeing it as a potential method for fund locking or even theft, stating, "The problem with KYC is that companies can use it as a pretext for locking funds."

Legal Recourse Considerations

As angst mounts, people are exploring legal options. Some users are advocating for a class action lawsuit against Changelly. Comments like, "We need to form a class-action suit against this," reveal a desire for action and increased accountability and user protection.

Interestingly, a user remarked, "AML/KYC isnโ€™t even the big problem; itโ€™s that they donโ€™t proceed with the exchange often without explanation," signaling a widespread perception of Changelly's inadequate transaction handling.

Migration to Alternative Services?

Experts have noted that if these transparency issues arenโ€™t addressed rapidly, as many as 40% of dissatisfied users may abandon Changelly in search of more dependable services. This potential exodus poses a significant threat to Changelly's operations.

This situation mirrors earlier times in banking where rigorous verification followed fraud scandals. Crypto enthusiasts today are looking for safe, reliable platforms for their investments.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿšซ Complaints about transactions on hold without clarity are surging.

  • โš ๏ธ Many people express irritation over excessive documentation requests.

  • โš–๏ธ Discussions about potential class-action lawsuits are gaining momentum.