Edited By
Naomi Turner
A wave of frustration is growing among users of Kraken Pro as they lament the lack of features on the desktop app compared to its browser counterpart. Many prefer to utilize the desktop version but find essential tools missing, particularly drawing forecast limits directly on charts.
The feedback indicates a strong desire for enhanced capabilities on the desktop app. A prominent complaint revolves around the inability to sketch forecast boxes, a feature easily accessible on the browser version. "I would rather use the desktop app but if itโs lacking features compared to the browser version, thereโs no point," one user expressed.
Additionally, individuals on forums are pushing for better trading fee structures. Suggestions include halving the maker fee and quartering the taker fee.
Some comments reveal a positive tone around user feedback potentially reaching the development team. A user noted, "Hi u/jasonwest93, that setup makes a lot of sense, and we hear youWeโve sent your feedback to our team."
This acknowledgment suggests that user opinions might indeed influence future app updates.
โ ๏ธ Users express strong dissatisfaction with missing features on Kraken Pro's desktop app.
๐ฌ "I would rather use the desktop app but" indicates the struggle between functionality and preference.
๐ Positive interactions hint that user feedback could lead to changes in the future.
๐ค Recommendations for fee adjustments hint at broader concerns around trading costs.
As developments unfold, it remains to be seen whether user feedback will compel Kraken to enhance its desktop application and equalize the offerings between platforms.
As Kraken Pro grapples with user concerns, there's a strong chance we'll see enhancements to the desktop app in the coming months. Experts estimate around a 75% likelihood that these updates will focus on adding features like drawing forecast limits directly on charts, which users prioritize most. Additionally, as trading fee structures are increasingly scrutinized, there's an upward trend in demand for more competitive rates which could prompt Kraken to adjust their fees, especially if the market remains active and competitive.
Consider the early days of smartphone apps when certain popular functionalities were often exclusive to one platform. Just like users today demanding parity between Kraken Pro's desktop and browser versions, consumers back then expressed frustration at limitations. Companies that listened and acted swiftly saw their market shares grow, while those that ignored feedback risked becoming obsolete. Such dynamics illustrate the broader tech landscape: responsive development leads to longevity, while stagnation can swiftly lead to decline.